Luh, J., Fisher, W. & Paul, R. Joint torque control by a direct feedback for industrial robots. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 28, 153–161 (1983).
Cheng, G. et al. A comprehensive realization of robot skin: sensors, sensing, control, and applications. Proc. IEEE 107, 2034–2051 (2019).
Dahiya, R. E-Skin: from humanoids to humans (point of view). Proc. IEEE 107, 247–252 (2019).
Cho, A., Kim, J., Lee, S. & Kee, C. Wind estimation and airspeed calibration using a UAV with a single-antenna GPS receiver and pitot tube. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 47, 109–117 (2011).
Xu, Z. et al. Digital mapping of surface turbulence status and aerodynamic stall on wings of a flying aircraft. Nat. Commun. 14, 2792 (2023).
Yang, S. et al. A survey of intelligent tires for tire-road interaction recognition toward autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 7, 520–532 (2022).
Liu, Y. et al. Electronic skin as wireless human–machine interfaces for robotic VR. Sci. Adv. 8, eabl6700 (2022).
Zhu, M. L. et al. Haptic-feedback smart glove as a creative human–machine interface (HMI) for virtual/augmented reality applications. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8693 (2020).
Sun, Z., Zhu, M., Shan, X. & Lee, C. Augmented tactile-perception and haptic-feedback rings as human–machine interfaces aiming for immersive interactions. Nat. Commun. 13, 5224 (2022).
Chortos, A., Liu, J. & Bao, Z. Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin. Nat. Mater. 15, 937–950 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kang, S.-K. et al. Bioresorbable silicon electronic sensors for the brain. Nature 530, 71–76 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. A review of wearable sensor systems to monitor plantar loading in the assessment of diabetic foot ulcers. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 67, 1989–2004 (2020).
Su, Q. et al. A stretchable and strain-unperturbed pressure sensor for motion interference-free tactile monitoring on skins. Sci. Adv. 7, eabi4563 (2021).
Lee, S. et al. Nanomesh pressure sensor for monitoring finger manipulation without sensory interference. Science 370, 966–970 (2020).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Boutry, C. M. et al. A stretchable and biodegradable strain and pressure sensor for orthopaedic application. Nat. Electron. 1, 314–321 (2018).
Yang, C. & Suo, Z. Hydrogel ionotronics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 125–142 (2018).
Chang, Y. et al. First decade of interfacial iontronic sensing: from droplet sensors to artificial skins. Adv. Mater. 33, 2003464 (2021).
CAS Google Scholar
Lee, H. R., Kim, C. C. & Sun, J. Y. Stretchable ionics—a promising candidate for upcoming wearable devices. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704403 (2018).
Yuan, Y. et al. Microstructured polyelectrolyte elastomer-based ionotronic sensors with high sensitivities and excellent stability for artificial skins. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202310429 (2023).
Sun, T. L. et al. Physical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity. Nat. Mater. 12, 932–937 (2013).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Leocmach, M., Perge, C., Divoux, T. & Manneville, S. Creep and fracture of a protein gel under stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 038303 (2014).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. & Colby, R. H. Polymer Physics (Oxford Univ., 2003).
Biot, M. A. General theory of three‐dimensional consolidation. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 155–164 (1941).
Zhu, J. & Liu, Q. The osmocapillary effect on a rough gel surface. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 170, 105124 (2023).
Karobi, S. N. et al. Creep behavior and delayed fracture of tough polyampholyte hydrogels by tensile test. Macromolecules 49, 5630–5636 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. The stiffness-threshold conflict in polymer networks and a resolution. J. Appl. Mech. 87, 031002 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
Choi, J.-H., Xie, W., Gu, Y., Frisbie, C. D. & Lodge, T. P. Single ion conducting, polymerized ionic liquid triblock copolymer films: high capacitance electrolyte gates for n-type transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 7294–7302 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, H. J., Chen, B., Suo, Z. & Hayward, R. C. Ionoelastomer junctions between polymer networks of fixed anions and cations. Science 367, 773–776 (2020).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fan, F. et al. Effect of molecular weight on the ion transport mechanism in polymerized ionic liquids. Macromolecules 49, 4557–4570 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
Yang, R. et al. Iontronic pressure sensor with high sensitivity over ultra-broad linear range enabled by laser-induced gradient micro-pyramids. Nat. Commun. 14, 2907 (2023).
Bai, N. et al. Graded intrafillable architecture-based iontronic pressure sensor with ultra-broad-range high sensitivity. Nat. Commun. 11, 209 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. Highly stable flexible pressure sensors with a quasi-hom*ogeneous composition and interlinked interfaces. Nat. Commun. 13, 1317 (2022).
Mannsfeld, S. C. B. et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat. Mater. 9, 859–864 (2010).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yiming, B. et al. A mechanically robust and versatile liquid‐free ionic conductive elastomer. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006111 (2021).
CAS Google Scholar
Nie, B., Li, R., Cao, J., Brandt, J. D. & Pan, T. Flexible transparent iontronic film for interfacial capacitive pressure sensing. Adv. Mater. 27, 6055–6062 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cui, X. et al. Flexible and breathable all-nanofiber iontronic pressure sensors with ultraviolet shielding and antibacterial performances for wearable electronics. Nano Energy 95, 107022 (2022).
CAS Google Scholar
Yu, X. et al. Ultra-tough waterborne polyurethane-based graft-copolymerized piezoresistive composite designed for rehabilitation training monitoring pressure sensors. Small 19, 2303095 (2023).
CAS Google Scholar
Bai, N. et al. Graded interlocks for iontronic pressure sensors with high sensitivity and high linearity over a broad range. ACS Nano. 16, 4338–4347 (2022).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, P. et al. Skin-inspired large area iontronic pressure sensor with ultra-broad range and high sensitivity. Nano Energy 101, 107571 (2022).
CAS Google Scholar
Shi, J. et al. Embedment of sensing elements for robust, highly sensitive, and cross-talk–free iontronic skins for robotics applications. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf8831 (2023).
Terabe, H. et al. in Proc. International Solid State Sensors and Actuators Conference (Transducers’ 97) Vol. 2 1481–1484 (IEEE, 1997).
Lu, P. et al. Iontronic pressure sensor with high sensitivity and linear response over a wide pressure range based on soft micropillared electrodes. Sci. Bull. 66, 1091–1100 (2021).
Chen, X. et al. Channel-crack-designed suspended sensing membrane as a fully flexible vibration sensor with high sensitivity and dynamic range. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 34637–34647 (2021).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ha, K.-H. et al. Highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensors over a wide pressure range enabled by the hybrid responses of a highly porous nanocomposite. Adv. Mater. 33, 2103320 (2021).
CAS Google Scholar
Docherty, K. M. & Kulpa, C. F. Jr Toxicity and antimicrobial activity of imidazolium and pyridinium ionic liquids. Green. Chem. 7, 185–189 (2005).
CAS Google Scholar
Rivlin, R. & Thomas, A. G. Rupture of rubber. I. Characteristic energy for tearing. J. Polym. Sci. 10, 291–318 (1953).
CAS Google Scholar